On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:27:28AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > Debian Project Secretary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is an interesting point. It all depends on the definition > > of what a resolution is, and whether a resolution can have multiple > > options, or not. I consider a resolution to be a formal expression of > > the opinion or will of an official body or a public assembly, adopted > > by vote. See "§A.1 Proposal" and "§A.1 Discussion and Amendment". > [...] > > While I am tentatively ruling this so, I am still open to > > feedback, and I would appreciate hearing from anyone who thinks my > > determination on this issue is at fault, in which case we shall discuss > > this further. > > Please would you regard each option as a resolution and allow people > to second all of them, or some subset of them if they wish?
I understand from the Secretary's explanation that this is so, and will send a new mail with all of them, asking seconders to pick a subset if they want. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]