Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Does this mean that even if the blob is GPL'd, we don't need sources >> for it? > > That sounds like it would be a GPL violation.
Only if the blob is not the actual source, no? Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
