Le Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 02:05:40PM +0100, Peter Palfrader a écrit : > > If anybody wants to change the words of either the DFSG or the SC they > will need to propose an amendmend. > > As proposed this clarifies my and other people's view of what our > foundation documents mean. You are welcome to add a > note/comment/explanation to the SC, but this doesn't modify it.
Hi Peter, the problem is that we were told that voting for your amendment makes it necessary to organise a vote to change the DFSG or the SC… I really understand your position, but apparently it is not me or you who decides. Can the Secretary clarify again what will hapen if Peter's option is voted ? - What if Peter does not think that a second vote is necessary, but the Secretary does ? - What if a second vote is organised, but not option gets a 3:1 majority ? - What if no second vote is organised ? - What if Peter's option is voted with less than a 3:1 majority ? Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
