On 27/11/08 at 10:19 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > The discussion period ended, and as there was actually no discussion taking > place, I think it would be appropriate to call for the vote soon. > > The ballot could list the proposal and its two amendments as on the web page, > and offer the following choices: > > [ ] Choice 1: Invite the DAM and all the contributors to further develop > their ideas.
This one is really tricky to summarize properly. what about s/develop/discuss/? 'develop' is a bit ambiguous here. > [ ] Choice 2: Ask the DAMs to postpone the changes. Ask the DAMs to postpone the changes until vote/consensus. ? > [ ] Choice 3: Ask the DAMs to implement the changes. > [ ] Choice 4: Further discussion. > > I welcome any feedback, but would in particular like to read from Peter and > Lucas before calling for a vote. Also, I do not know how the choices should be > ordered (randomised?) and of course leave the decision to Neil. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
