On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 09:45:56AM -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote: > ,----[ Proposal 4: Allow release managers leeway to include non-dfsg bits as > needed ] > | Debian's priorities are our users and free software. We don't trade > | them against each other. However during getting an release out of the > | door, decisions need to be done how to get a rock stable release of the > | high quality Debian is known for, release more or less on time, and to > | minimize the usage of problematic software. We acknowledge that there > | is more than just one minefield our core developers and the release > | team are working at. > | > | We as Developers at large continue to trust our release team to follow > | all these goals, and therefor encourage them to continue making > | case-by-case-decisions as they consider fit, and if necessary > | authorize these decisions. > | > | (Since this option overrides the SC, I believe it would require 3:1 > | majority) > `----
This (and the vote web page) is missing one of the spelling corrections from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: therefor -> therefore. I would also suggest the following changes; Andi, I'd appreciate if you would acknowledge these under A.1.6 of the SRP: s/ during/, while/ s/an release/a release/ s/need to be done/need to be made about/ s/rock stable/rock-stable/ s/working at/working in/ s/case-by-case-decisions/case-by-case decisions/ s/authorize these decisions/we authorize these decisions/ None of these changes are intended to change the meaning of the resolution; if I've misunderstood the intended meaning of the resolution, let me know and I'll propose different wording to clarify those points. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
