On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:42:20PM +0000, Matthew Johnson wrote: > However, I think retitling 5 to: "Assume firmware blobs are in source > form unless proven otherwise" is worthwhile as is retitling 1 to: "Delay > Lenny release until all DFSG issues are resolved".
> I wouldn't say this is the secretary trying to skew anything, I just > think that it makes the meaning of the choices slightly clearer. If > people read the text below then it is clear. As written in <http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/12/msg00003.html>, this is not the case at all. It's possible that the secretary didn't notice this mail because I didn't cc: him; but if he saw this mail and chose not to acknowledge the arguments, then he is behaving in a wholly improper manner with regard to this vote, and frankly I see no reason that we as a project should even honor the outcome of a vote on this ballot as presented. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
