On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:59:37PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: >Le Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 02:52:01PM +0000, Steve McIntyre a écrit : >> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 09:05:54PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: >> >Le Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:57:06AM +0000, Neil McGovern a écrit : >> >> With approximately 60 hours remaining, 142 people have voted, out of a >> >> potential 1018. This is somewhat of an record for low participation. >> > >> >Hi all, >> > >> >I have nothing against a voting period lasting the standard two weeks. >> >> That's all very well, but I'm afraid it has little relevance. > >No sarcasms please:
There was no sarcasm there. The DPL was asked about shortening the voting period, and I said yes. As specified in the constitution. >you were asked in private to shorten the discussion period, where >nothing happened for two weeks, and you did nothing. We all have our >share of errors during this conflict on the membership rules. I was hoping that we would be able to resolve things here without wasting effort on a formal vote, so I did not ask the secretary to bring the vote forward. As we've now been forced to vote, I would like us to get it over and done with as quickly as possible so we can move on to more important things. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [email protected] < sladen> I actually stayed in a hotel and arrived to find a post-it note stuck to the mini-bar saying "Paul: This fridge and fittings are the correct way around and do not need altering" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
