Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17 2008, Luk Claes wrote: > >> Manoj Srivastava wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 14 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 03:02:17AM +0000, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
>>> Seems liek there was plenty of time to change things, and add >>> some of the power set options on to the ballot. If I had added options >>> willy-nilly, you would have screamed again of abuse of power. >> Sure, though you could have followed the procedure or hinted people in >> an even saner direction IMHO. > > I followed the procedure that I think we have followed in the > past. We do ont make people jump through "and replace all the words in > the proposal by these words" hoops, and we put related proposals on the > same ballot. Unfortunately, some of the proposals are not mutually > exclusive, so combinations are possible; and I did not want to > increase the size of the ballot with combinations; I think had I done > that, there would still have been accusations of the ballot being too > complex. Right, this kind of makes your above point moot IMHO. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org