On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 09:28:27AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Superseding a document is easily recognizable: it's when you explicitely > say that you're going to change its _content_ (ex: > http://www.debian.org/vote/2004/vote_003 ). Any time that this is not the > case, you should assume that we're not changing our common goal but that > we're discussing the interpretation that we make of it
If that is the case, why would anyone propose changing a foundation document, and risk failing to meet the 3:1 requirement, when they could simply declare that they interpret it to say what they would like it to say, and have a 1:1 vote? Thanks Ian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
