On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 02:00:37AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > I've decided to ask the DPL and project secretary to rule on this issue > based on the following considerations: > - the Project Secretary is the guardian of the constitution and thus the > correct role to rule on consequences of previous votes;
Not really. Being the "guardian of the constitution" makes the secretary the final authority on interpreting the constitution itself; that doesn't imply any particular power to interpret resolutions. Interpretation of resolutions is best left to those who are expected to implement them. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
