----- "Wouter Verhelst" wrote: > Nowhere in the constitution is it said that the DFSG is law, and that it > cannot be overridden. Nowhere in the constitution is it said that the > social contract is law, and that it cannot be overridden. > I'm not saying we should just thump them out, but a temporary compromise > is not necessarily a change of our principles. > So, yes, that does require interpretation.
Could we please vote on whether the Social Contract is the "foundation" of the constitution? This notion that the SC is a "suggestion" is making my brain hurt. -- Ean Schuessler, CTO Brainfood.com [email protected] - http://www.brainfood.com - 214-720-0700 x 315
