On Sat Mar 14 12:51, Luk Claes wrote:
> Hmm, I thought the reason we delayed it till after the release is so we
> could discuss things and only when we have a consensus to change or seem
> to have clear options, to get to a vote.
> 
> As I saw your name mentioned next to the constitutional issues, I
> thought you were going to tackle one point after another to lead the
> discussions and not just to try to defend your own views?

Well, I was going to, but there's no discussion to lead! 

The main thing is that I really really don't want nothing to have
happened by the time we are trying to release squeeze.

Matt

-- 
Matthew Johnson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to