On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:51:37PM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 03:47:57PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > > >PROPOSAL START > >======================================================================== > >General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian > >Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements > >to initiate one are too small. > > > >Therefore the Debian project resolves that > > a) The constitution gets changed to not require K developers to sponsor > > a resolution, but floor(2Q). [see §4.2(1)] > > b) Delaying a decision of a Delegate or the DPL [§4.2(2.2)], > > as well as resolutions against a shortening of discussion/voting > > period or to overwrite a TC decision [§4.2(2.3)] requires floor(Q) > > developers to sponsor the resolution. > > c) the definition of K gets erased from the constitution. [§4.2(7)] > > > >(Numbers in brackets are references to sections in the constitution). > >======================================================================== > >PROPOSAL END > > Assuming that you'll provide explicit diffs for the constitution: > > Seconded.
I'm not really sure how to interprete this. Does this mean you'll only second it after he changes the proposal to include the diff? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org