On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:26:59AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:01:38AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:10:49PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > PROPOSAL START > > > ===================================================================== > > > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian > > > Project. While over those years, some problems have arised during the > > > discussion and/or voting of some resolutions, there is no evidence that > > > changing the number of sponsors (seconds) for GR proposals or amendments > > > will help solve those problems. Instead, by making it harder to propose > > > general resolutions or amendments, it might make it harder to improve > > > imperfect resolutions, or to add valuable options to a ballot. > > > > > > Therefore the Debian project reaffirms the current requirements for the > > > sponsoring (seconding) of GR proposals or amendments, and for overruling > > > of delegates. > > > ===================================================================== > > > PROPOSAL END > > > > Seconded. > > > > I realise there are already sufficient seconds to make this a valid > > option on the ballot, but it seems reasonable to see what it actually > > takes to get to the 15 or 30 or so seconds being proposed before voting. > > (From the vote.d.o page I gather there's currently 8 seconds for the > > proposal to require 2Q seconds, and 5 for Q seconds) > > It's now at: > 2Q: 9 > Q: 7 > Keep current: 7
To be complete, there is also: - Bill Allombert's simular proposal with 1 second. - MJ Ray's proposal about the expiry-on-failure with 1 second - Neil McGovern's s/K/Q/ with 1 second Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org