Hi
There seem to be some disagreements about the terms in the subject. As
far as I'm concerned it's pretty clear though and would not need any
vote to clarify:
Overriding is only used in combination with decisions. You cannot
override a document or its interpretation/meaning. You can only override
a DD's (or delegate's) decision.
Amending is changing something written like a foundation document or a
proposal. As far as I can see you can only amend explicitly so there
should be no confusion.
A position statement is a decided on proposal that clarifies the
position of the Debian project, but does not explicitly amend a
foundation document.
Supersession of a Foundation Document is replacing a Foundation Document
with another version: introduce a new one, ammend one or remove one.
According to the Debian Constitution there is only a 3:1 majority needed
to ammend the Constitution or supersede a Foundation Document.
So I don't really see what we should vote on unless someone disagrees
with above interpretations?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
