Charles Plessy <[email protected]> writes: > The second option aims at clarifying what is the source of the Debian > operating system. It is controversial. Despite it does not change our > fundation documents, I think that a GR would be needed to make sure that > there is a general agreement.
For whatever it's worth, I believe the second option changes the foundation documents and would require a 3:1 majority. The person who's canonical on that is the Secretary, of course, but I wanted to note publicly that even the above statement about the nature of the proposal is controversial. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
