Le Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:46:22AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl a écrit : > > That opens up for an interesting question: What ways to settle a > conflict with fellow Debian Developers seem proper to you? Do we have > to expect further unspecified ignores from your side should you be > elected?
Le Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:58:47AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a écrit : > > OK, so I do have a few followup questions: > (1) What do you consider to be insulting or accusatory? > (2) As example: Will you, as DPL, consider "You haven't answered in the > past four weeks" as accusatory? > (3) How will we, as DDs, know if you consider something as insuluting or > accusatory? > (4) Do you believe ignoring conflicts to be a solution? Hi again, ignoring conflicts is the best way to have them explode at the worse moment. On the other hands, being insulted on a mailing list does not call for an answer. This is the best receipe for having flamewars. If I am elected DPL, I will not ignore requests. Neither will I filtrate my mailbox (but deleting spam by hand also leads to accidental loss of messages). I will read all my emails. I hope I will not disapoint you, but I will not give a lecture of what is an insult or what is not. I promise that I will not nitpick people's words to find excuses to not do my DPL work. Lastly, for the meaning of ‘accusatory’, perhaps I could have found a better word? But I am not a native speaker. What I mean is that if in one message, somebody writes ‘you want this [bad thing]’ or ‘you did not do that [good thing]’, it can be better to refrain to answer in a discussion that goes nowhere. As a DPL, however, I would clarify if people spread false informations on our mailing lists. Cheers, -- Charles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100324153605.ga11...@kunpuu.plessy.org