On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 07:21:10AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Hi all, > > I hope that our constitution has the answer to that question. If a GR needed > self-locking dispositions, that would go against the idea of having a > constitution at all. My personal opinion is that for things that should not > be > changed apart with a GR, the Constitution offers the status of Foundation > Document. So if the diversity statement is not a foundation document, I do > not > see what would forbid to change it after the GR.
Note that a foundation document requires a 3:1 majority to change it, while a posistion statement only requires a simple majority. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
