On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 01:51:07PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > My message was, in the words of Constitution 4.2.5, an > > announcement on a publicly-readable electronic mailing list > > designated by the Project Leader's Delegate(s) > > (I assume that listmaster have designated debian-vote for this purpose.) > > There is no constitutional requirement for these things to be signed. > > > > But to avoid having to have this argument, I have signed this email. > > FAOD I restate: I hereby sponsor Matthew's GR. > > > > If you would like the constitutional power to require such statements > > to be signed, or make other requirements about formalities, that would > > require a constitutional change. I wouldn't be opposed to that. (It > > would make it possible to impose a format requirement, for example, so > > that these actions could be automatically tracked.) If you think this > > is a good idea, it could perhaps be bundled into the set of procedural > > constitution fixes under consideration by the TC. > > I think that under A.3.4 that I have the power to decide on the > procedure.
Also see: https://www.debian.org/vote/howto_proposal Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140302154354.ga8...@roeckx.be
