* Iain Lane ([email protected]) [140302 19:28]:
> The rest of the discussion notwithstanding, where do you think that
> 
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 02:50:00PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > […]  
> > That doesn't contradict the GR.  If the GR passes we have two
> > resolutions:
> > 
> >  11th Feb as modified by GR: sysvinit as default, loose coupling
>                                ^^^^^^^^
> 
> sysvinit comes from?

I think a qualified spelling error, and should read as "systemd as
default, loose coupling".



Andi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]

Reply via email to