What if the DPL begins to consider persistent disagreement with the DPL as a form of "flaming"?
----- "Wouter Verhelst" <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd like to propose a rationale for option one on the ballot, if I > may: > > Rationale: > Allowing the DPL to update the Code of Conduct will make it easier > to > adapt it to changing circumstances, without having to go through a > lengthy GR procedure. One of the roles of the DPL is to mediate in > case of conflict; therefore, the DPL is in an ideal position to > detect > when an update to the code of conduct may be necessary. > > If the DPL were to go rogue and replace the Code of Conduct by a > blank > page (or similar), we already have sufficient procedures to recall > or > override the DPL. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
