Jonathan Dowland <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 08:38:25AM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote: > > I wonder if, in the circumstances, the DPL should use their power > > under 4.2.4 to reduce the discussion period to 1 week. > > I think this is a terrible idea. I agree that there are entrenched people on > two sides of the argument, but there are others (myself included) who want to > give a well-constructed GR (thus, we need a round of amendments to consider) > proper, thorough consideration. > > If we start messing with the GR process in this way then whoever is on the > losing side of the outcome will call the whole process foul.
Good point. Regards, Matthew -- "At least you know where you are with Microsoft." "True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle." http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
