Le vendredi, 17 octobre 2014, 19.50:22 Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > We need the GR to ensure situation stays good. No big deal.
That's the fundamental crux of the disagreement I think: A GR will _not_ automagically generate upstream attention for non-systemd support. Point. If your "good" situation is a situation where non-systemd setups continue to work, what's needed to ensure it stays so is "people putting up the work everywhere needed", _not_ a GR (which is "people have stated a collective opinion"). Post-Jessie, trying to coerce sysvinit maintenance burden on maintainers is directly against §2.1.1 of our constitution; trying to coerce sysvinit maintenance burden on upstreams will simply not happen, no matter how many GRs we might pass in that hope. Cheers, OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/11311148.CxcO47Piez@gyllingar
