David Weinehall writes ("Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init
systems is desirable but not mandatory"):
> OK, so packaging uselessd (thus providing another init system that
> provides -- most of -- the systemd interfaces) would solve all your
> worries?
This resolution will be interpreted by humans, specifically individual
maintainers, the TC, and the release team - not by robots.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
