On 21/10/14 at 20:09 -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> writes: > > Q2: support for alternative init systems as PID 1 > > ================================================= > > A2.1: packages MUST work with one alternative init system (in [iwj]) > > (if you are confused with “one” here, it’s basically fine to read it as > > “sysvinit” instead. See [10]this subthread for a discussion about > > this) > > I believe Ian's intended reading is that a package that depends on > uselessd | systemd (but does not work with sysvinit) would be allowed by > his proposal.
Thanks for pointing this out. I clarified this in the blog post: http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/blog/?p=845 Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
