On 4 November 2014 21:30, Don Armstrong <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 04 Nov 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> On 04/11/14 at 17:53 +0000, Neil McGovern wrote: >> > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >> > 57dd4d7c-3e92-428f-8ab7-10de5172589e >> > [ ] Choice 1: Packages may not (in general) require a specific init >> > system >> > [ ] Choice 2: Support alternative init systems as much as possible >> > [ ] Choice 3: Packages may require specific init systems if maintainers >> > decide >> > [ ] Choice 4: General Resolution is not required >> > [ ] Choice 5: Further Discussion >> > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > Why not just make Choice 2: > > Packages should support sysvinit for jessie. > > Otherwise, if you all aren't able to agree, just: > > Choice 1: Proposal > Choice 2: Amendment A > Choice 3: Amendment B > Choice 4: Amendment C > Choice 5: Further Discussion > > and we can get on with the voting. >
+1, I was also expecting the ballot to be like this, which indeed would force people to read the full texts of the vote, as I do not think the summaries are fair (they are either under or over stating the actual choice text) -- Regards, Dimitri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CANBHLUhER_9=s56djpkuogjbjc61pqnxfr7vzt1l+fxqjm2...@mail.gmail.com
