>>>>> "Stefano" == Stefano Zacchiroli <[email protected]> writes:
Stefano> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:33:28PM +0000, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> While I do think that 4-5 years is a good term length, I do think
>> a lot of churn can be bad, and 2-r makes a lot of sense to me for
>> the reason you give above.
Stefano> Not sure if you've read it Sam, but just in case: I find
Stefano> Phil's example in <[email protected]> to be most
Stefano> convincing against the 2-R model in general. If, OTOH, your
Stefano> objective is avoid churn in the *short* term, then dropping
Stefano> the transitional measure as mentioned by Scott and Lucas
Stefano> would be more than enough. (And, in fact, we can even have
Stefano> intermediate solutions like bumping the transitional
Stefano> measure from 1 months to 6.)
My concern is long-term churn.
I don't find that message compelling and would definitely second an
amendment with 2-r.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/00000149cec89e49-54cb5205-435d-4755-8411-c0d960173cb0-000...@email.amazonses.com
