On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:15:05PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > === BEGIN GR TEXT === > > Title: Acknowledge that the debian-private list will remain private. > > 1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private > lisa archives" is repealed. > 2. In keeping with paragraph 3 of the Debian Social Contract, Debian > Developers are strongly encouraged to use the debian-private mailing > list only for discussions that should not be disclosed. > > === END GR TEXT ===
So to clarify the situation, I can find (signed) seconds from: - Thibaut Paumard <[email protected]> - Bart Martens <[email protected]> - Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <[email protected]> - Holger Levsen <[email protected]> There is also an unsigned second from: - Ondrej Sury <[email protected]> Then there is a proposal from Iain Lane <[email protected]>: ======================================================================== Title: debian-private shall remain private 1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private list archives" is repealed. 2. There shall be no declassification of any portion of the debian-private archives, except when the authors of all material being declassified have explicitly consented. 3. Participants are reminded to use -private only when necessary. ======================================================================== Which is prefered by Steve M. Robbins <[email protected]>, and I'm not sure I should count that as a second. Then there is Ian Jackson's proposal with 2 seconds: - Micha Lenk <[email protected]> - Gunnar Wolf <[email protected]> Did I miss something? Kurt
