Hello Chris! >Apologies for the delay in getting back to you.
lol, apologies not accepted :p The new queue is nearly empty, so thanks to all of you ftpmasters! >Personally, I wouldn't say "most conversations" here, but I am >trying to avoid this conversation becoming a debate on the minutiæ… yeah, I might have written something like "a lot of useful conversations" :) >I would concede that that there are some advantages to having public >IRC logging, but I don't see anywhere near enough advantage to warrant >the Leader pushing it as a policy, as well as many disadvantages and, >naturally, an extremely high switching cost. this is a valid point, thanks >This is despite me veing very much in favour of asking questions in >public — which admittedly isn't exactly same as logging — even going >so far as to write a blog post about it: > > https://chris-lamb.co.uk/posts/dont-ask-your-questions-in-private > nice reading, thanks for sharing it! >Did you have specific types of conversations in mind when you addressed>your >question? Perhaps ensuring those become transparent in another way >would assuage your concerns. As said, a lot of times I have to read #-ftp #-buildd #-logs and maybe #-devel-changes (or whatever is called). e.g. bugs on #-devel-changes are useful to have a track of new bugs, new unblock requests (during freeze times), or just to know which packages have interest in the community. #-ftp is a nice place to know how dak is happy (and yeah, probably such logs are useful in a context of some hours after somebody wrote that stuff) same for #-buildd, to know chroot issues, or toolchain related sadness (e.g. all the recent binutils failures on mips/powerpc) #-release... well it is our main goal to release, so reading conversations there is a must for us :p (also, I can know how fast I have to fix RC bugs, or see opinions by our RT team on various topics). thanks Gianfranco

