Le dimanche, 1 avril 2018, 00.11:58 h CEST Adrian Bunk a écrit : > Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 11:03:00PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > Like it or not, but there *is* a big difference in the project making > > something available for the big wide world (which a public NEW would > > be), or a user putting it somewhere readable for everyone even though > > the latter might be using project resources too. > > What is the big (legal) difference between distributing something > from the Debian group on the Debian machine salsa.debian.org, and > distributing the same from a different Debian machine?
People are mirroring the Debian pool under a set of well-understood norms, as
that's what the Debian project "produces" (think of the mirror network, people
pressing CDs, etc). A .deb in a Debian suite in the Debian pool isn't
comparable to a random .deb, as only the former has the Debian-seal-of-
approval (DFSG & fulfills releasability criterias).
Salsa is not meant to be mirrored by third-parties, and really shouldn't.
Cheers,
OdyX
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
