On 3/20/19 2:29 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > 2) More specifically, if you believe that we should not aim for being > fully universal, *how* (in terms of decision-making processes) do you > think that we should draw a line about what's acceptable, for > example to decide how to cater to the needs of an hypothetical Debian > GNU/Darwin on m68k port? And what's your own opinion on where that line > should be (specific examples could rely on debian-ports, release > architectures, support for non-Linux kernels, init systems, ...)
To add to this question: Do candidates think Debian "competes" for "share"/"mindshare" of users and contributors in the "Linux distro" category? And if so, what do they think users and contributors expect from a "universal" distro in 2020? Do we think it even matters, or is it being reimagined? Do candidates think that Debian has far more technical deliverables than packages in a repo plus installers? And if so, do candidates think the organizational structure [1] accurately reflects this? Would DPL candidates propose changes to the organizational structure? How would they use, for example, delegations to re-shape the org structure? [0] https://www.debian.org/intro/organization
