On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 11:24:44AM -0800, Joshua Hudson wrote: > The debate on systemd often turns into systemd vs. sysvinit because sysvinit > is > the working alternative right now. Unfortunately, this is a poor way > to frame the > debate. The reality is sytemd unit files are a really good idea, but systemd's > hardware detection leaves much to be desired. > > You're going to get stuck with a lot of debates and really stupid support > issues > if you try to force systemd, because the hardware detection frequently > outsmarts > itself. > > Thus I filed an issue with systemd to separate out the early boot from the > rest > of systemd so that component can be replaced independently on deployed > systems. No, I don't think they're actually willing to do it, but it > would squash > most/all of the real issues. > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/14058 For the record, this was closed with "afaics everything you are asking for is already implemented, and pretty much documented".
-- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
