Re: Proposal: General Resolution on Init Systems and systemd Facilities

[Bernd Zeimetz]

On 11/15/19 3:06 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> The problem with even your option B is that there is no effective
> route for non-systemd systems to "catch up" as you put it.

For some systemd Features there is no sane route to implement them for a
non-systemd system. Especially all the security features, private
directories and so on. They will never catch up as it is technically
impossible or an enormous amount of work. So not haveing a route here is
perfectly fine.


-- 
 Bernd Zeimetz                            Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 http://bzed.de                                http://www.debian.org
 GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485  DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F