Steve Langasek writes ("Proposed amendment to Proposal D"): > I'd like to propose an amendment to your proposal D, to strike the sentence: > > We are disappointed that this has had to involve another GR. > > I have not decided yet how I'm going to vote in this GR, but I think that > the above sentence can only weaken support for your proposal by conflating > the question of what our init system policy should be, with meta commentary > on the procedure used to decide that policy. > > I personally find it more difficult to support this proposal because of this > mixing of concerns.
Thanks for this feedback. I have received a private email in support of your comment. Unless anyone objects by 1400 UTC on Wednesday, I intend to accept this amendment, assuming that this is procedurally kosher. Ian. -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.