Simon Richter <[email protected]> writes: > No, Sam's interpretation was correct. My assumption was that in the > other direction it was already obvious that "it should work with > systemd" was not negotiable and no one was really asking for that. I'm > not sure we need to spell that out.
Oh, indeed, I misread your message (there is a "not" in there that my eyes totally skipped twice), and then managed to confuse Sam. Apologies! -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
