On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 04:15:02PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > I think we can use the constitutional process to delay this, to make
I feel that the air in -vote has been getting very heavy in the last day or so, and I was quite happy that Sam opted to cut the pain short and go for a vote. I agree that all the useful options seem to be on the ballot, and I look forward to see what comes out. I would prefer that we didn't start something that looks like meta-discussing options, and meta-discussing whether to meta-discuss options, and so on. Nitpicking on the constitutional process like this looks to me like an interesting move in some competitive board game. I would prefer to see less competition, and more cooperative focus on trying to make Policy unstuck while trying to keep pain to a minimum. Enrico -- GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
