Hi, On 05/12/2019 15:21, Sam Hartman wrote:
"Matthew" == Matthew Vernon <[email protected]> writes:Matthew> Sam Hartman <[email protected]> writes: >> I read [1], Guillem's message talking about how he believes the >> G+D proposal weakens option G alone. >> >> [1]: >> https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/[email protected] Matthew> Later in that thread ( Message-ID: Matthew> <[email protected]> ) Guillem Matthew> explicitly rebuts the suggestion that they are unhappy Matthew> about G+D appearing on the ballot: Matthew> " Just to clarify, and to avoid any possible reading of Matthew> subtext implying I'm unhappy with the combination in the Matthew> new proposal: " Ah, reading that message for the second time, I agree with your intrepretation. It was less clear to me on first reading.
Do I assume correctly, therefore, that you now agree that G+D should be on the ballot?
Regards, Matthew [it seems clear to me, but worth checking :) ]
