Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> writes:

> What I would have hoped is that project members would trust the people that 
> they have (indirectly) delegated the responsibility to run Debconf to to do a 
> good job and only once there is something that's enough of a problem to 
> require a project wide decision to change their decision consider a GR.

In this case, the solicitation of registrations for the conference
absolutely felt like "enough of a problem" to at least begin discussing
corrective action.  That said solicitation turned into something more
like a poll on whether we should have the event was sufficiently
corrective for me.

[shrug]  YMMV.

Bdale

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to