Nicolas Dandrimont dijo [Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 06:27:48PM +0200]: > > (...) > > [A] Call for the FSF board removal, as in rms-open-letter.github.io > > (proposed by Steve Langasek, currently base proposal) > > > > [B] Call for Stallman's resignation from FSF all bodies > > (proposed by Sruthi Chandran, currently proposal B) > > > > [C] Discurage collaboration with the FSF while Stallman is in a leading > > position > > (proposed by Santiago Ruano Rincón, currently proposal C) > > > > [D] Call on the FSF to further its governance processes > > (proposed by Jonathan Wiltshire, currently proposal D) > > > > [E] Debian will not issue a public statement on this issue > > (proposed by Timo Weingärtner, currently proposal E) > > > > [F] Support Stallman's reinstatement, as in rms-support-letter.github.io > > (proposed by Timo Weingärtner, currently proposal A) > > (...) > > I would suggest moving proposal E to the top or to the bottom of the > ballot, as one can argue that this "status quo" option doesn't > really fit within the "condemn → support" axis you've proposed. I > think I agree with how the other options are ordered.
Makes sense. OTOH, we usually take FD as "preserve status quo"; FD usually appears (and should appear this time as well, sorry for not capturing it in my ballot proposal) as the last option. I understand, option E is not semantically identical to FD, but is equivalent in the way that it means "do nothing project-wide, either for or against".
