Timo Röhling <[email protected]> writes: > I was under the impression that this amendment by the original > proposer does not require re-sponsoring, and my consent is > implicitly assumed unless I choose to object. Am I wrong?
> (If I am, consider this my sponsoring of the amended version) That's also my understanding; I don't think anyone else has to do anything unless they object. (But of course Kurt's ruling is the one to follow.) -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
