On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 10:31:44AM -0700, [email protected] wrote: > Dear Mr. Secretary, > > As a Second for the winning Option 2, I was personally happy with last > night's vote, but I nonetheless object to your certification of these > tentative results: > > > Option 2 defeats Option 3 by ( 142 - 107) = 35 votes. > > Option 2 defeats Option 4 by ( 185 - 61) = 124 votes. > > Would you please explain why Option 2 defeated NOTA by 124 votes but at > the same time defeated Option 3, which was identical to NOTA, by only 35 > votes?
Clearly people don't think it's identical, otherwise it would not have been an option, or people would have voted it equally. > If so, did Option 2 pass the majority test only because Option 3 was > available separately? Option 3 has no effect on the majority results. The options are compared to the NOTA option. > I believe the vote should be redone. I currently don't see anything wrong with this vote, so I see no reason to redo it. Kurt
