On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 09:22:51PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 11:33:15AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > > Hi Steve (and everyone else), > > > I believe that there is reasonably wide support for changing what we > > > do with non-free firmware. I see several possible paths forward, but > > > as I've stated previously I don't want to be making the decision > > > alone. I believe that the Debian project as a whole needs to make the > > > decision on which path is the correct one. > > > > Gulp, such a big jump! :) I personnally feel that we should make it > > easier for people to install Debian, but I'm not quite sure I'm ready to > > completely ditch the free images just yet. Maybe we could just promote > > non-free images a little better, but I would much rather keep the free > > images around. I guess that makes me a supporter of option "B", > > Rather option C. Option B is reinforcing the current situation. C proposes to > promote non-free images a little better while keeping the free images.
Oops, my bad. B and C are similar on this aspect. A relevant difference is however that in B the non-free images are promoted above the free ones. > > > if I > > understand correctly, but I am known for struggling with parsing GR > > proposals. :) > > > > Thanks again for all your work, and for everyone for having a (so far) > > rather polite discussion on this possibly difficult topic. > > > > a. > > > > -- > > Time is a created thing. To say, "I don't have time" is like saying, > > "I don't want to." > > - Lao Tzu > > > --
