[email protected] wrote: > In this message I discuss in some detail five packaging workflows. I am more familiar with the gbp patches-unapplied workflow: can you point us to some educationlly relevant example repositories using the git-debrebase workflows? (Maybe without dgit, to make things easier to understand.)
[gbp] >ftpmaster's alternative design, AIUI: > >The alternative design I've been positing supposes including a >manifest of the contents of the unpacked source package. Ie, patches >applied. But why does it have to be patches-applied? Then both sides could easily (?) compute a canonical hash of the patches-unapplied git repositories, and it would still provide the same security properties. -- ciao, Marco
