On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 10:05:23PM +0100, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
The real issue, in my view, is not the tool itself but the risk of AI-generated slop/spam. If someone chooses to use these tools, the responsibility for filtering bad output before a git commit remains with the maintainer/developer.
+1 with one exception: I would find it interesting to have a git commit of the code put out by the LLM to be able to see how big the human part in the final product is.
So my position is: Debian should be open to this technology, without blanket restrictions on tool choice. Contributions should be judged by quality and correctness, and contributors should remain responsible for what they submit.
+1 The copyright and license issue remains a problem though. Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421
