Hi,

On 7/23/26 20:12, Marc Haber wrote:

I still have to manually grep trough the sources of a package I maintain to manually create debian/copyright files instead of uploading the source package to an LLM asking for a debian/copyright file (and of course sampling whether the output makes sense)?

Yes, because otherwise you are offloading this work to the DFSG team.

The problem with AI workflows is that they move the effort from the "writing" to the "reviewing" stage. Doing a proper review is more than "sampling" the output, so the "efficiency" gain of such an approach happens on the backs of other volunteers.

This is one of the main issues open source projects have with AI-generated submissions: it takes more work to review these than it took to generate them, in some cases even more work than writing the code by hand would have taken.

The role of the submitter then changes from a person *doing* work to a person *directing* the work of the volunteers -- basically, I can raise the priority of my wishlist bugs by simply feeding it to a prompt, and dumping the result into a PR. The actual work is then done by the maintainers in the time they reserved for onboarding new project members.

That is where the "loss of trust" comes from. I am happy to provide extensive feedback if it helps someone learn, because that is how we build a resilient free software ecosystem, but if that feedback is just going to be pasted into a prompt, it is a waste of my time, but it registers as an "efficiency" gain for the AI prompter, because my work is cheaper than even AI tokens.

It could kill Debian.

People getting frustrated with reviewing slop has a much higher chance of killing Debian.

Obligatory remark: my main issue with AI is resource usage, that alone makes it completely unacceptable for me to use for anything. Any concerns about the negative social or technical effects are secondary, but I recognize that there are people who believe that the resource expenditure can somehow be rationalized, and who need other arguments.

   Simon

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to