On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 09:18:15AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: >... > I insist in the idea that we could perfectly go without a patch for > devotee if we would first sit together and draft options that are easier > to decide about. As Antonio wrote before[1] we have > > a) ban LLM-assisted contributions completely > b) tolerate LLM-assisted contributions under a set of constraints.
While the choices could be better and clearer, it is not true that there would be only two when you start looking at the "set of constraints". Some examples: Options E and F would create a right to not disclose AI usage, which is a non-starter for me. Requiring disclosure of AI usage would be a different ballot option. Option G bans generative AI in direct contributions to Debian, but permits other AI usage like AI agents in Debian infrastructure. Is that a) or b) for you? > I would prefer if we work on a sensible wording for those options first > and vote about these afterwards. The DPL did choose to not extend the maximum discussion period, and suggesting this the day after the discussion period ended cannot make any difference for this GR. > Kind regards > Andreas. >... cu Adrian
