Hi, Aurelien. 2009/5/11 Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]>: > Hi all, > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 07:35:27AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: >> > Hi, all. >> >> Hi >> >> > I am building debian autobuild-network by a local network to support >> > new architecture (SH4). >> > I worked buildd and wanna-build in one of them before. >> > Because I was able to obtain several SH4 boards, I want to increase buidd >> > node. >> > I think that I want to do my image as follows. >> > >> > buildd-node(sh4) <---- >| >> > | >> > buildd-node(sh4) <----->| <------> wanna-build & data-base & quinn-diff >> > (amd64) >> > | >> > buildd-node(sh4) <------ | >> > >> > I was able to look for some documents[0][1][2], but was not able to >> > find a method to operate wanna-build >> > with another machine. >> > Would you teach a setting method or setting document? >> >> Is there any particular reason why you want to do it yourself instead of >> working together with debian-ports.org [3]? >> >> I'm putting the contact address for debian-ports.org in Cc and I hope >> you can work something out together. >> > > As explained on the website, debian-ports.org can provide you: > - a repository to host packages and CD images > - a wanna-build database > - a web interface to the build logs > - a DNS hosting service > - a POP server for build daemons behind NAT > > And you can choose to use only part of that, for example only the > wanna-build database. The machine has an IPv6 connection, which is > useful for build daemons behind a DSL line.
OK, we want to use - a repository to host packages and CD images - a wanna-build database - a web interface to the build logs We want to use it as follows if we are necessary. - a DNS hosting service - a POP server for build daemons behind NAT > > People working on the ports (even if not Debian Developers) can have an > account on the machine, to manage the wanna-build database, or have a > web page and a git repository related to the port. For the upload rights > we prefer to allow it only for Debian Developers, as it is something > necessary when the packages are then moved to the official debian.org > archive, but the final decision is left to the porters. > I understood these. Could we use debian-ports.org? Please teach the next step that I should take. Best regards, Nobuhiro -- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
