Le mardi 22 juin 2010 à 10:01 +0200, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > Sylvestre Ledru, le Tue 22 Jun 2010 09:20:18 +0200, a écrit : > > Le dimanche 20 juin 2010 à 00:55 +0200, Kurt Roeckx a écrit : > > > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:22:41PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > > Le samedi 12 juin 2010 à 00:25 +0200, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > > > > > Sylvestre Ledru, le Sat 12 Jun 2010 00:01:25 +0200, a écrit : > > > > > > Does anyone see a better way of handling this specific problem ? > > > > > > > > > > Can't atlas just build the binaries and not try to run then? > > > > No because Atlas is building many time the same sources to see which > > > > optimisation performs best... > > > > > > Does that mean it's optimizing for the hosts that build it? > > It is indeed the way atlas is working... > > The best way to achieve maximum performances is to build locally atlas. > > No doubt about that. > > Then can't there be a flag to just select a not-so-optimised-but-generic > version? This task is done by the base package of atlas.
> Note btw that the current packaging doesn't permit to easily rebuild it > locally, since as soon as you don't have an sse3 processor, the debian > scripts complain that there is no sse3-optimised version. Indeed, I should disable this check when the custom build is done. Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
