Op maandag 03 oktober 2011 19:48:47 schreef Thijs Kinkhorst: > Hi Kurt, > > Op zondag 25 september 2011 17:48:46 schreef Kurt Roeckx: > > On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 01:35:46PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > I also don't understand why they get rejected once the key > > > expired. The signatures are from before the key expired and > > > perfectly valid. > > > > I should probably clarify this. Of course you can't trust that > > the signature wasn't made after the key expired. > > Why do these keys expire so quickly? Can't we have a really large window, > say a year, in which the key stays valid after the date it was last in > use? > > > But we really should have a process so that once it's accepted it > > stays accepted, even when it moves to an other host. > > How do you propose we solve this concrete issue?
I prefer that at least the krb5-appl and opensaml2 builds are made available before the point release this weekend. Let me know what I can do to help. Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
