On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 12:03:25AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > >> Thanks, and same for you! >>>Can you look into the build failure below, the chroot >>>seems hosed and IIRC you're the buildd admin. >> Looking... > >>>W: Conflicting distribution: http://security-master.debian.org lenny/ >>>Release (expected lenny but got ) >>>W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems >> Maybe this is the problem. Both toffee and cats are showing the same >> problem in recent logs AFAICS. Has the setup of the security archive >> on s-m changed recently? > >Not recently. Beginning of December. Let me cite a mail from back then: > >--8<------------------------schnipp------------------------->8--- >From: Joerg Jaspert <[email protected]> >Subject: security buildd changes >To: [email protected] >Cc: [email protected] >Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 11:38:39 +0100 > >Hey, > >we talked about it sometime more than a year ago, but now its final and >needs to be done: > >buildd security lines for the security incoming MUST be > >deb http://security-master.debian.org/buildd-$suite / > >and not, as some of them have now > >deb http://security-master.debian.org/buildd/ $suite/ > >(with suite one of lenny, squeeze or wheezy). > >Please adjust them to that. > >(This is the same way as on main (and bpo) archive, as our tool >"manage-build-queues" simply does not provide a "Codename:" line, which >is what the second line actually let apt expect. We only now switched >security.)
Great, that seems to have fixed toffee. Doing the same on cats now too. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [email protected] Google-bait: http://www.debian.org/CD/free-linux-cd Debian does NOT ship free CDs. Please do NOT contact the mailing lists asking us to send them to you. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
